Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 23 Nov 2002 01:17:58 -0800
From:      Terry Lambert <tlambert2@mindspring.com>
To:        Anthony Atkielski <anthony@freebie.atkielski.com>
Cc:        FreeBSD Advocacy <freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: FreeBSD on the desktop (was: TheRegister article on Hotmail)
Message-ID:  <3DDF47C6.88FE04BF@mindspring.com>
References:  <20021121161453.GA69019_submonkey.net@ns.sol.net> <008501c2917a$ac643080$0a00000a_atkielski.com@ns.sol.net> <200211221502.gAMF2a6a089963@catflap.bishopston.net> <20021122234047.GB60785@wantadilla.lemis.com> <014201c29296$f9cc4a20$0a00000a@atkielski.com> <20021123071534.GC39240@wantadilla.lemis.com> <01e101c292c8$1aa8cda0$0a00000a@atkielski.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Anthony Atkielski wrote:
> > Too often, Microsoft comes across like a child's
> > toy: brightly coloured and weak on functionality.
> 
> That's what the market wants.

Given that Microsoft is a monopoly, how can you tell the
difference between "what the market wants" and "what the
market is forced to use by virtue of an illegal leveraging
of monopoly powers"?

Just  because the primary focus of the Antitrust decision that
recognized the Microsoft monopoly was their leveraging of
their OS to force competing broswer vendors out of business
doesn't mean that they haven't used that same leverage against
vendors of other applications.  Most Windows boxes come with
Outlook Express [leveraging the monopoly to extinguish competing
mail clients, such as ZMail] and Microsoft Word [leveraging the
monopoly to extinguish competing word processors, such as Word
Perfect] and Microsoft Peer-to-peer Networking [leveraging the
monopoly to extinguish competing peer-to-peer networking, such
as LANtastic] and Microsoft Client networking [leveraging the
monopoly to extinguish competing client/server networking, such
as Novell NetWare].

In all these cases, Microsoft has driven competitors out of
business with "free" software, whise actual costs were borne
by the 80% profit margin on Windows, which they could charge
that much for, due to their OS monopoly.

IMO, ZMail kicks Outlook's butt, but you are never going to
see it any more, despite it's higher quality, not because it's
not what the market wants, but because Outlook Express is
illegally bundeled in the Windows pricing, instead of priced
seperately.

-- Terry

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-advocacy" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3DDF47C6.88FE04BF>