Date: Fri, 06 Jun 2003 03:08:45 +0400 From: Sergey Matveychuk <sem@ciam.ru> To: Kirk Strauser <kirk@strauser.com> Cc: freebsd-gnats-submit@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/52790: New port: shells/bash-completion Message-ID: <3EDFCD7D.30000@ciam.ru> In-Reply-To: <87y90gqny6.fsf@pooh.honeypot.net> References: <3EDE03E3.8090102@ciam.ru> <87y90gqny6.fsf@pooh.honeypot.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Kirk Strauser wrote: > Thanks for fixing that. It worked correctly on my system before using the > "shar" command to create the archive, but I don't know enough about that > command to get it to do the right thing. I think the pacth was good and may be shar archive too. But something has changed tabs with white spaces. May be your MUA? > Should it be dependent on bash2? While I agree that it's mostly useless > without bash2, isn't there a possibility that it could be regarded as > documentation, or used with a Linux bash from one of the linux_base > installations? Yes, there is a possibility. But I don't think a man will use bash without putting path to it into $PATH. If so port will satisfied. But if the port will not found bash in $PATH it'll install shell/bash2. I think it's reasonable. --- Sem.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3EDFCD7D.30000>