Date: Fri, 29 Aug 2003 17:32:58 -0400 From: Matthew Donadio <mdonadio@comcast.net> To: Joe Marcus Clarke <marcus@marcuscom.com> Cc: freebsd-gnome@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Gnome 2.4 Message-ID: <3F4FC68A.BEE0199@comcast.net> References: <3F4F9156.7AEAB897@comcast.net> <1062179702.47188.28.camel@shumai.marcuscom.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Joe Marcus Clarke wrote: > There haven't been any GNOME > components removed, only moved. That is, bonobo-activation will be part > of libbonobo, stickynotes_applet will be part of gnomeapplets2, and > themus and fontilus will be part of gnomecontrolcenter2. Ah, this makes sense now. > > For those of us who track the ports tree, should there be any headaches > > that we should be aware of, or will a cvsup and porupgrade be > > sufficient? > > I'm still working on that. I don't want to have to hunt down all the > ports that depend on, say, atk, and bump their PORTREVISIONS (though, if > people think I should, I will). > > What I'm considering now is the following recipe: > ... That looks cool. I was thinking of config issues that would result in logging into a wonked desktop. I just had a thought. How is nautilus-cd-burner implemented? If it uses the CAM layer, then there probably needs to be something mentioned in a README since atapicam isn't in the GENERIC kernconf file. -- Matthew Donadio (m.p.donadio@ieee.org)
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3F4FC68A.BEE0199>