Date: Tue, 02 Dec 2003 21:52:48 +0100 From: "Roger 'Rocky' Vetterberg" <listsub@401.cx> To: Eric Anderson <anderson@centtech.com> Cc: freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org Subject: Re: uptime 4.0 Message-ID: <3FCCFBA0.4000203@401.cx> In-Reply-To: <3FCCF774.5010209@centtech.com> References: <s35eNvogEu@dmeyer.dinoex.sub.org> <1070394752.363.105.camel@ptp.northnetworks.ca> <3FCCF5DC.1070902@centtech.com> <1070397145.363.114.camel@ptp.northnetworks.ca> <3FCCF774.5010209@centtech.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Eric Anderson wrote: > Steve Bertrand wrote: > >>> Did you even READ the message? It definitely was advocacy related if >>> you ask me.. 1200 days uptime? That's no question - that's an ANSWER. >>> >> >> My deepest apologies! I am very sorry to make such an insulting post. >> >> My bad...my bad...I'll go back to see if mine made 200+ yet. >> > > :) no worries.. just wanted to make sure you realized what you were > looking at.. 1200 is crazy.. > > Heh - my highest uptime on a box is 630 days - FreeBSD 4.5-RELEASE.. > > Eric > I've seen 650+ days on a FreeBSD 4.4-REL. Then someone was moving some UPS's around and managed to unplugg *both* powersupplies at the same time. Redundancy doesnt help if the admins are idiots. I do know of a P90 running OpenBSD that is closing in on 900 days, but I guess that belongs on another mailinglist. -- R
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3FCCFBA0.4000203>