Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 13 May 2009 14:36:45 +0200
From:      "Paul B. Mahol" <onemda@gmail.com>
To:        Chris Whitehouse <cwhiteh@onetel.com>
Cc:        User Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: ndis0 interrrupt storm
Message-ID:  <3a142e750905130536t44129963ie3b191ffea47bbeb@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <4A09D206.7030305@onetel.com>
References:  <49F78DD0.70007@onetel.com> <3a142e750905011711pc9c77f7p67e883e96fac7170@mail.gmail.com> <ade45ae90905011832g36736171p35fdcda8227907a2@mail.gmail.com> <4A03528F.7070405@onetel.com> <3a142e750905080326q2c21e669xc08aaafbf0fbf36@mail.gmail.com> <4A04968E.5060203@onetel.com> <3a142e750905090742i4bf80d45n323a81d3e18223a@mail.gmail.com> <4A089A87.8040800@onetel.com> <3a142e750905120322h2eb984a6q786ad99287ae2cbb@mail.gmail.com> <4A09D206.7030305@onetel.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 5/12/09, Chris Whitehouse <cwhiteh@onetel.com> wrote:
> Paul B. Mahol wrote:
>>
>> Just typing bt on db prompt for now should be enough.
>
> panic: sleeping thread
> cpuid = 0
> KDB: enter: panic
> [thread pid 1497 tid 100073 ]
> Stopped at    kdb_enter+0x3a: movl    $0,kdb_why
> db> bt
> Tracing pid 1497 tid 100073 td 0xc356c900
> kdb_enter(c0c3d8fa,c0c3d8fa,c0c42726,d4001b68,0,...) at kdb_enter+0x3a
> panic(c0c42726,ffffffff,0,cc,4,...) at panic+0x136
> propagate_priority(c0d9df84,0,c0c4249e,2e1,c356d180,...) at
> propagate_priority+0x18c
> turnstile_wait(c356d180,c37b2240,0,18d,c34fc06c,...) at turnstile_wait+0x44d
> _mtx_lock_sleep(c34fc06c,c356c900,0,c38de072,6b4,...) at
> mtx_lock_sleep+0x18e
> _mtx_lock_flags(c34fc06c,0,c38de072,6b4,c089dc98,...) at mtx_lock_flags+0xf7
> ndis_ticktask(c3821700,c34fc000,c37e8e3c,c3916bd0,c38fc6e0,...) at
> ndis_ticktask+0x3a
> _end(c37e8e3c,d4001d38,c0c39438,333,c37ab548,...) at _end+0x321d
> fork_exit(c38fc600,c37e8e3c,d4001d38) at fork_exit+0xb8
> fork_trampoline() at fork_trampoline+0x8
> --- trap 0, eip = 0 esp = 0xd4001d70, ebp = 0 ---
>
>
> Typed by hand but I'm pretty sure it is correct.
>
> Don't know if it is significant but repeating the panic gave quite a few
> different values.

Post them too. If only numbers are different and stack is same that
could help even more.
This is on i386?

-- 
Paul



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3a142e750905130536t44129963ie3b191ffea47bbeb>