Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2009 19:23:17 +0400 From: Alexander Churanov <alexanderchuranov@gmail.com> To: Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com> Cc: Dag-Erling Sm??rgrav <des@des.no>, Roman Divacky <rdivacky@freebsd.org>, hackers@freebsd.org, "Shaowei Wang \(wsw\)" <wsw1wsw2@gmail.com> Subject: Re: llvm/clang a tool chain or just a compiler for FreeBSD? Message-ID: <3cb459ed0907220823q2376f545x44c0972a989a4b72@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20090722141756.GQ55190@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> References: <2e566b9e0907202134h5568a06bl33a8d95ac9c7f845@mail.gmail.com> <20090721131735.GA18929@freebsd.org> <2e566b9e0907211818k1a52ef7am5c681a6f4ffc868c@mail.gmail.com> <864ot5jy3f.fsf@ds4.des.no> <20090722141756.GQ55190@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
2009/7/22 Kostik Belousov <kostikbel@gmail.com>: > I believe that the nearest action that is quite reasonable and > profitable by its own merit is divorcing base compiler and compiler used > to build ports. Even if this means that we would "only" have different > versions of gcc. > I know some ports using "USE_GCC" knob of /usr/ports/Mk/bsd.gcc.mk . Is this the same as you suggest? Alexander Churanov
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3cb459ed0907220823q2376f545x44c0972a989a4b72>