Date: Thu, 08 May 2025 11:13:31 +0200 From: Trenton Schulz <trueos@norwegianrockcat.com> To: freebsd-desktop@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Call for testing] New utility: audio(8) Message-ID: <3dbb48a0a6f4796d2319efd63585b1ef74f72075.camel@norwegianrockcat.com> In-Reply-To: <fi4tq6ouw7tteprpufprjw3eqts2vfa3o37hojt6miwiop32el@zbun6fzd7c2s> References: <yogqbepd7uznm6bg5zohczynq55l3yotv7u54k5bwwr3kv3el3@cezkkxhzlpxz> <fi4tq6ouw7tteprpufprjw3eqts2vfa3o37hojt6miwiop32el@zbun6fzd7c2s>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, 2025-05-05 at 14:04 +0200, Christos Margiolis wrote: > Opinions on the name? Is better to keep it as audio(8) or rename it > to > sndctl(8)? What about taking inspiration from ifconfig and doing something like soundconfig (or audioconfig or sndconfig)? Otherwise, as a utility name, audio doesn't really have any "action" involved, so something like "control" or "config" is probably a move towards a better name. Best regards, -- Trenton
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3dbb48a0a6f4796d2319efd63585b1ef74f72075.camel>