Date: Wed, 12 Apr 2006 11:14:20 -0400 From: "Andy Greenwood" <greenwood.andy@gmail.com> To: "Paul Schmehl" <pauls@utdallas.edu> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Wanted: Flash player for <browser_of_choice>.... Message-ID: <3ee9ca710604120814u6ca61bf5pd459a1cdd5a3ec3f@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <443D170C.3080103@utdallas.edu> References: <443BB35B.6050801@computer.org> <20060411204721.S35382@tripel.monochrome.org> <443C59BF.60901@computer.org> <200604121137.32229.work@ashleymoran.me.uk> <443D170C.3080103@utdallas.edu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 4/12/06, Paul Schmehl <pauls@utdallas.edu> wrote: > > Ashley Moran wrote: > > On Wednesday 12 April 2006 02:37, Eric Schuele wrote: > >> Either way... I hope somehow they see fit to loosen the language a bit > >> in the future. > > > > Can't we petition Adobe somehow? I'm a bit stuck now - my company's > main > > application is written in Flash! > > > Petition? How about we sue them? How can a vendor dictate what > platform they allow their software to run on? Just because they > designed it for some other OS doesn't mean, if I can figure out a way to > make it work, that they can tell me I can't run it on that platform. With the Current EULA, that's exactly what they CAN do I'm not a lawyer either, but frankly I think their EULA is unenforceable > and their attitude ought to cost them customers. I'll agree with you here. Hopefully they'll see the light and change the EULA. -- > Paul Schmehl (pauls@utdallas.edu) > Adjunct Information Security Officer > The University of Texas at Dallas > http://www.utdallas.edu/ir/security/ > > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?3ee9ca710604120814u6ca61bf5pd459a1cdd5a3ec3f>