Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 11 Feb 1999 13:04:10 -0800
From:      Deepwell Internet <freebsd@deepwell.com>
To:        Dennis <dennis@etinc.com>
Cc:        freebsd-isp@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject:   Re: Bandwidth limiting/trafic shaping
Message-ID:  <4.1.19990211125823.00b7c340@mail1.dcomm.net>
In-Reply-To: <199902111937.OAA23570@etinc.com>
References:  <Pine.BSF.4.02.9902110934320.25532-100000@NetSurfer.lp.lviv .ua>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Although kernel throttling is a good solution, I disagree with your
thoughts that any of the "fancier" shaping mechanisms give you no
additional features.  

Kernel throttling will never give you the relational shaping that
class-based-queueing gives.  We have quite a few machines under a
class-based queueing machine and have it tweaked quite well.  With class
based queueing you can define "classes" of computers and define which
machines have priority over others.  You can also give people "guaranteed
information rates" and let them burst above into any unused space.  We also
have ICMP shaped into a seperate class.  Most of these can't be
accomplished with kernel throttling.

Thanks!
Terry Ewing


At 02:47 PM 2/11/99 -0500, you wrote:
>At 09:38 AM 2/11/99 +0200, you wrote:
>>Hello everybody!
>>
>>Can someone comment about comparison of bandwidth limiting software like
>>dummynet or bwmgr from ET inc. and alternative queuing schemes like ALQ
>>with Class Based Queuing (CBQ)? All seem to provide similar effects but
>>which is preferable in what situation?
>>
>>If I'll get enough feedback I'll post summary.
>
>There are a lot of fancy names out there, but there is no evidence that the 
>fanciest ones work any better. Ours is a physical limiter, kernel based with 
>no additional interrupt overhead and can handle just about any level of
>traffic 
>that the machine can handle without it. Our new HTML interface makes it 
>easy to manage also.
>
>Others are free and may work just fine for you as well. :-)
>
>Dennis
>
>
>To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
>with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-isp" in the body of the message



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4.1.19990211125823.00b7c340>