Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 20 Nov 1999 22:01:13 -0700
From:      Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org>
To:        "David Schwartz" <davids@webmaster.com>, "Phil Regnauld" <regnauld@ftf.net>
Cc:        <freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG>
Subject:   RE: Marketing vs. technical superiority (was: Judge: "Gates Was Main Culprit")
Message-ID:  <4.2.0.58.19991120215941.0424c2a0@localhost>
In-Reply-To: <000001bf327c$3a115090$021d85d1@youwant.to>
References:  <19991119113011.62880@ns.int.ftf.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 02:52 AM 11/19/1999 -0800, David Schwartz wrote:

>         The allegations that Microsoft raises prices when it achieves market
>domination are clearly false, at least for the most rigorous studies of the
>US market to date. (See Liebowitz and Margolis, for example)

Liebowitz and Margolis are both paid, handsomely, by Microsoft to produce
so-called "scholarly" papers that support its current marketing and/or
legal spin. The fact that you cite them at all strengthens my conviction
that you are being paid by Microsoft to troll this list.

--Brett Glass



To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4.2.0.58.19991120215941.0424c2a0>