Date: Sun, 23 Jan 2000 23:02:02 -0700 From: Brett Glass <brett@lariat.org> To: Greg Lehey <grog@lemis.com> Cc: freebsd-chat <chat@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: UCITA (Important) Message-ID: <4.2.2.20000123230049.00d51100@localhost> In-Reply-To: <20000124112548.D2398@mojave.worldwide.lemis.com> References: <4.2.2.20000123010329.01aba360@localhost> <4.2.2.20000121141100.019a6370@localhost> <4.2.2.20000121131307.01a32380@localhost> <Pine.BSF.4.21.0001212105050.31653-100000@dogma.freebsd-uk. <4.2.2.20000121141100.019a6370@localhost> <20000122133716.J391@mojave.worldwide.lemis.com> <4.2.2.20000123010329.01aba360@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
At 08:25 PM 1/23/2000 , Greg Lehey wrote: > > Why mention some restrictive licenses (e.g. the Microsoft EULAs) > > and not others (e.g. the GPL)? > >Because you need to keep your audience's attention. Perpetual >GNU-bashing will just have a large number of people saying "Oh, >Brett's turning this into an anti-GPL diatribe again", and stop >reading. Opposing restrictive licenses -- whether they're the Microsoft EULA or the GPL -- isn't "bashing" or a "diatribe." It's good sense. --Brett To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4.2.2.20000123230049.00d51100>