Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sun, 3 Sep 2006 21:45:06 -0500
From:      "hackmiester (Hunter Fuller)" <hackmiester@hackmiester.com>
To:        Noah <admin2@enabled.com>
Cc:        freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: migrating user and web files to new server
Message-ID:  <40100EC0-B71A-4671-946A-FCA371E85B4B@hackmiester.com>
In-Reply-To: <44FB82AE.3000908@enabled.com>
References:  <44FA6142.30609@enabled.com>	<314FC15A-DA2C-4D03-9469-3522EE0C9FEA@shire.net>	<44FA638B.5020500@enabled.com>	<0F79193E-402E-41B4-AAE1-E7CBB39CC642@shire.net>	<44FA64E6.10800@enabled.com>	<44FA6853.2050103@partylemon.com>	<44FAFBC2.7070001@enabled.com> <44FB19F5.80204@partylemon.com>	<44FB1ACC.6040404@enabled.com> <712C8F83-C27F-4A98-8A1B-5C6A7DB5CA74@hackmiester.com> <44FB82AE.3000908@enabled.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

On 3 September 2006, at 20:34, Noah wrote:

> hackmiester (Hunter Fuller) wrote:
>>
>> I find it incredibly interesting that, while you REFUSE SPECIFY  
>> exactly what you want, you find it necessary to deem certain  
>> commands unacceptable! No one is going to freaking spoon feed you  
>> this stuff! What you just pasted will do basically THE SAME THING  
>> as tarring and scping it over, so what's the problem? The only  
>> difference is there is no intermediate tar file. If that's what  
>> you wanted, why can't you just SAY THAT?!
>>
>
> cool.  it is different though.  ssh and scp are quite different  
> syntax.  thank you.

Obviously they are different syntax, but the two commands posted give  
you the same end result. Why are you rejecting the syntax?!

>
> cheers,
>
> Noah
>
>
>




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?40100EC0-B71A-4671-946A-FCA371E85B4B>