Date: Thu, 26 Feb 2004 14:49:55 -0500 From: "Shaun T. Erickson" <ste@ste-land.com> To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Looking for ipfw info. Message-ID: <403E4DE3.60103@ste-land.com> In-Reply-To: <MIEPLLIBMLEEABPDBIEGAEOAFMAA.Barbish3@adelphia.net> References: <MIEPLLIBMLEEABPDBIEGAEOAFMAA.Barbish3@adelphia.net>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
JJB wrote: > > -----Original Message----- > From: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > [mailto:owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org]On Behalf Of Shaun T. > Erickson > Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2004 2:08 PM > To: Barbish3@adelphia.net > Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org > Subject: Re: Looking for ipfw info. > > JJB wrote: > > >>The problem with all those links is that what they write about is >>outdated and complete mis-directs the reader into using IPFW's >>legacy stateless rules when only stateful rules should be used to >>get the max level of protection. > > > The rules she gives in her second article most certainly describe > creating a stateful firewall. > > Yes for an firewall without an lan behind it Which is exactly what I'm trying to set up. > www.a1poweruser.com Is where you can purchase the complete results > of my in-depth research, as soon as I complete the buy now button > function. Check back in a week. Can someone who isn't trying to sell me something, corroborate anything he's said? It would be nice to hear from someone else, too. :) -ste
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?403E4DE3.60103>