Date: Sun, 03 Jun 2012 11:22:54 +0700 From: Erich <erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com> To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Cc: Chris Nehren <apeiron+freebsd-stable@isuckatdomains.net> Subject: Re: Why Are You NOT Using FreeBSD? Message-ID: <4069760.8WmX7zQx9F@x220.ovitrap.com> In-Reply-To: <20120602185601.GD2309@isuckatdomains.members.linode.com> References: <C480320C-0CD9-4B61-8AFB-37085C820AB7@FreeBSD.org> <95D35900-AC63-4948-B54F-40041FFCB232@gromit.dlib.vt.edu> <20120602185601.GD2309@isuckatdomains.members.linode.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi, On 02 June 2012 PM 2:56:01 Chris Nehren wrote: > On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 14:11:06 -0400 , Paul Mather wrote: > > I'm not sure what the solution is for the end user. I know I get > > somewhat leery of updating my ports if I see a large number of changes > > coming via portsnap (like the 4000+ that accompanied the recent libpng > > upgrade) and there is nothing new in UPDATING (which, happily wasn't > > the case with the libpng upgrade). Usually, I wait a while for the > > dust to clear and an UPDATING entry potentially to appear. > > If you're concerned about things breaking, don't follow the bleeding > edge. This seems to be common sense. is there a second version of the ports tree available? What is the response of the list if you want to install a new package with you old ports tree? Erich
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4069760.8WmX7zQx9F>