Date: Sat, 22 May 2004 16:30:39 +0200 From: Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com> To: Florent Thoumie <flz@xbsd.org> Cc: portmgr@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/67036: bsd.port.mk: Clarify PORTDOCS comment. Message-ID: <40AF640F.7050603@fillmore-labs.com> In-Reply-To: <40AF45E7.9090405@xbsd.org> References: <200405221303.i4MD3x7v042190@freefall.freebsd.org> <40AF45E7.9090405@xbsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Florent Thoumie wrote: > Talking to Oliver, it seems I misunderstood the role of PORTDOCS, > or at least, I thought it handles more things that it actually > does. > > There should be a note telling that PORTDOCS is automatically added > to the package list, I don't think it's in the Porter's Handbook. > It's not a serious problem as it is only a way to reduce pkg-plist > but I think it worth it. I totally agree that PORTDOCS is underdocumented and should be explained more clearly. I appreciate efforts and didn't mean to scare you away. Please add a, additional patch for the Porter's Handbook. :) -Oliver
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?40AF640F.7050603>