Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2004 16:35:47 +0200 From: Alex Dupre <ale@FreeBSD.org> To: Yar Tikhiy <yar@comp.chem.msu.su> Cc: ports@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: NO_CDROM and NO_PACKAGE set together? Message-ID: <40C088C3.3020408@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <20040604142439.GA25434@comp.chem.msu.su> References: <20040604142439.GA25434@comp.chem.msu.su>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Yar Tikhiy wrote: | Is it all right to set both NO_CDROM and NO_PACKAGE for a port | to indicate that mirroring the original distfiles is the only thing | allowed by the license? Yes. | The comments at the top of bsd.port.mk, and the Porter's Handbook | seem to imply that these variables are mutually exclusive. I personally reworded that paragraph in the Porter's Handbook to be much more clear. And I read in the first note: "NO_PACKAGE and NO_CDROM are independent and can be set simultaneously." So I don't know how you can say that the handbook seems to imply they are mutually exclusive :-) - -- Alex Dupre -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFAwIjCgRXp2M5fVU0RAlRjAKDpiC/dkNMRU/DmOJ/neKRIQ6I/TACgzRrl kzIXCFPDV2CTwvoboPOXESY= =32Nu -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?40C088C3.3020408>