Date: Mon, 23 Aug 2004 19:00:32 -0400 From: "Dan Langille" <dan@langille.org> To: Oliver Eikemeier <eikemeier@fillmore-labs.com> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: LATEST_LINK unique or not? Message-ID: <412A3ED0.12730.80F02992@localhost> In-Reply-To: <14C14956-F555-11D8-8CAA-00039312D914@fillmore-labs.com> References: <412A1B18.4785.80649D9F@localhost>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 24 Aug 2004 at 0:37, Oliver Eikemeier wrote: > Dan Langille wrote: > > > Is LATEST_LINK supposed to be unique? It's not. There's about 201 > > ports which have duplicate values. > > It is, expect when NO_LATEST_LINK is set (in which case no latest link > exists). Did you filtr out these cases? Everything else is bug, Kris did > some survey AFAIK. I obtained my list from the output of "make -V LATEST_LINK" and paid no attention to NO_LATEST_LINK. Are you saying LATEST_LINK must be ignored if NO_LATEST_LINK is set? Why is this not done programatically? i.e. output an empty string. -- Dan Langille : http://www.langille.org/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?412A3ED0.12730.80F02992>