Date: Tue, 05 Oct 2004 20:09:50 -0400 From: Mike Edenfield <kutulu@kutulu.org> To: krinklyfig@spymac.com, ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: FreeBSD 5.3-BETA7 available Message-ID: <416337CE.5040901@kutulu.org> In-Reply-To: <200410041853.12931.krinklyfig@spymac.com> References: <4160259A.3070708@FreeBSD.org> <200410041744.43292.krinklyfig@spymac.com> <20041005013257.GB1462@isis.wad.cz> <200410041853.12931.krinklyfig@spymac.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Joshua Tinnin wrote: > > Whoa ... ok, so: > > ldd /usr/X11R6/bin/* | grep libm.so.2 > > alone shows that quite a lot on my box is going to need rebuilding ... I I would suspect that any port which performs any significant functions, especially graphical functions, will need to be rebuilt. It would be safer to just do what you suggested and `portupgrade -af`. As for libmap.conf, the format is basically: oldlib newlib so there would be a single like that looks like this: libm.so.2 libm.so.3 However, I initially thought this wouldn't work. I thought it only worked if the interfaces for the two libraries were identical -- but if the interfaces were identical, why the need for a library version bump? But several people have suggested it so I guess it couldn't hurt. --Mike
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?416337CE.5040901>