Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 19 Oct 2004 22:16:00 -0400
From:      Glenn Sieb <ges@wingfoot.org>
To:        Alex de Kruijff <freebsd@akruijff.dds.nl>, freebsd-questions@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Upgrading a 5.1-RELEASE-p10 system...
Message-ID:  <4175CA60.1060907@wingfoot.org>
In-Reply-To: <20041020010116.GC822@alex.lan>
References:  <417579FB.6090805@wingfoot.org> <20041019213837.GB822@alex.lan> <41758B49.8040205@wingfoot.org> <20041020010116.GC822@alex.lan>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Alex de Kruijff said the following on 10/19/2004 9:01 PM:

>Gerely speeking, STABLE doesn't mean things never gets broken. Most
>reliable are the RELEASE plus fixes. So don't follow 5-STABLE but
>5-RELENG
>  
>
To help ease frustration and such.. you mean:

Follow RELENG_5_2 not RELENG_5 (from: 
http://www.freebsd.org/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/handbook/cvs-tags.html)

In cvsup-supfile speak for those of us using cvsup to sync our source trees

Thanks for the advice, Alex! :)

Best,
G.

-- 
"They that can give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary 
safety deserve neither liberty nor safety." 
          ~Benjamin Franklin, Historical Review of Pennsylvania, 1759



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4175CA60.1060907>