Date: Fri, 18 Mar 2005 18:32:51 -0500 From: Adam Weinberger <adamw@FreeBSD.org> To: Adam Weinberger <adamw@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Max recursion level (500) exceeded. Message-ID: <423B6523.5090904@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <423B5B22.8030100@FreeBSD.org> References: <BAY2-F39AB90DE56749D63EB232AB1570@phx.gbl> <20050315172854.GG91771@hub.freebsd.org> <44psy04ppa.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <20050315205119.GR91771@hub.freebsd.org> <44wts8zfbi.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <20050315230358.GV91771@hub.freebsd.org> <44k6o47iny.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <44acp07h63.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <423B5B22.8030100@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Adam Weinberger wrote: > Lowell Gilbert wrote: > >> Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-ports-local@be-well.ilk.org> writes: >> >> >>> Kris Kennaway <kris@FreeBSD.org> writes: >>> >>> >>>> On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 05:58:57PM -0500, Lowell Gilbert wrote: >>>> >>>> >>>>>>> I get it on "make clean" for editors/openoffice-1.1, but I haven't >>>>>>> managed to track the problem down. With an empty environment and an >>>>>>> empty make.conf. But that takes so long to build anyway that I >>>>>>> don't >>>>>>> really care very much... >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> Let us know if/when you study it in more detail knowing the above >>>>>> probable cause :-) >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> I knew the "usual cause." That's why I tried it with an empty >>>>> make.conf and a minimal environment, under various shells. And a >>>>> simple "make conf" still goes into spasms of recursion. >>>> >>>> >>>> It doesn't for me, so you'll still need to debug this some more on >>>> your own or at least post some details. >>> >>> >>> So far, I've tracked it down to calculating the all-depends-list in >>> lang/gcc32. And if I deinstall gcc32, the problem goes away. >> >> >> >> The problem comes from the USE_GCC variable in the gcc32 Makefile. >> Is USE_GCC broken for "ORLATER" if a later gcc is already installed? > > > ENOPARSE on that last line, sir. > > That USE_GCC line shouldn't be creating any sort of BROKEN assignment. > And it shouldn't choke if gcc > 3.2 (or gcc > 2.7) is installed. > > The only thing I'm confused about is why openoffice-1.1 has an explicit > BUILD_DEPENDS on gcc32, rather than just using USE_GCC=3.2. > > However, you are most certainly correct in that when I deinstalled > gcc32, make clean went smoothly and quickly. The problem lies in the gcc32 port. It redefines USE_GCC. It, and the other gcc ports, need not to do that. # Adam -- Adam Weinberger adamw@magnesium.net || adamw@FreeBSD.org adamw@vectors.cx || adamw@gnome.org http://www.vectors.cx
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?423B6523.5090904>