Date: Sun, 24 Apr 2005 16:19:16 +0200 From: Matthias Buelow <mkb@incubus.de> To: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org> Cc: Palle Girgensohn <girgen@pingpong.net> Subject: Re: background_fsck=no does not work? Message-ID: <426BAAE4.1040606@incubus.de> In-Reply-To: <426BA8FA.3080602@samsco.org> References: <DD8197BD35BCC63A18AF62CB@palle.girgensohn.se> <426BA8FA.3080602@samsco.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Scott Long wrote: > not always be clean. Softupdates (hopefully) means that it will be > consistent and recoverable, but what you're seeing here is normal and Why "hopefully"? Aren't people convinced that it works correctly? mkb.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?426BAAE4.1040606>