Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 19 Sep 2016 15:59:20 -0700
From:      Lyndon Nerenberg <lyndon@orthanc.ca>
To:        Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru>
Cc:        FreeBSD Stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: LAGG and Jumbo Frames
Message-ID:  <42A03EA9-7F8E-446E-B430-7431AB9CE2E6@orthanc.ca>
In-Reply-To: <20160919220812.GG2960@zxy.spb.ru>
References:  <48926c6013f938af832c17e4ad10b232@dweimer.net> <alpine.BSF.2.20.1609191326280.93154@orthanc.ca> <04c9065ee4a780c6f8986d1b204c4198@dweimer.net> <alpine.BSF.2.20.1609191419030.93154@orthanc.ca> <20160919220812.GG2960@zxy.spb.ru>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help

--Apple-Mail=_DE3568EF-F524-45B3-92F1-C07102A1522F
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain;
	charset=us-ascii


> On Sep 19, 2016, at 3:08 PM, Slawa Olhovchenkov <slw@zxy.spb.ru> =
wrote:
>=20
> This is because RTT of this link for jumbo frames higher 1500 bytes
> frame for store-and-forward switch chain.

For TCP, RTT isn't really a factor (in this scenario), as the windowing =
and congestion avoidance algorithms will adapt to the actual =
bandwidth-delay product of the link, and the delays in each direction =
will be symmetrical.

Now the ack for a single 9000 octet packet will take longer than that =
for a 1500 octet one, but that's because you're sending six times as =
many octets before the ACK can be generated.  The time to send six 1500 =
octet packets and receive the ACK from sixth packet is going to be =
comparable to that of receiving the ack from a single 9000 octet packet. =
 It's simple arithmetic to calculate the extra protocol header overhead =
for 6x1500 vs 1x9000.

If there *is* a significant difference (beyond the extra protocol header =
overhead), it's time to take a very close look at the NICs you are using =
in the end hosts.  A statistically significant difference would hint at =
poor interrupt handling performance on the part of one or more of the =
NICs and their associated device drivers.

The intermediate switch overhead will be a constant (unless the switch =
backplane becomes saturated from unrelated traffic).

--lyndon


--Apple-Mail=_DE3568EF-F524-45B3-92F1-C07102A1522F
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: attachment;
	filename=signature.asc
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature;
	name=signature.asc
Content-Description: Message signed with OpenPGP using GPGMail

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----

iQIcBAEBCAAGBQJX4G3IAAoJEJCSmizucT9VZnQQALMucy5vTuLJZUitVi90UfdU
OTQO/fFJmT7uuG7wK1nsrFf051bsHbCIEQ4rBP8kTa2PfnG0mpm2UYT6TV352x0Y
R8yE3GJ19EFrc31t1NRqGdt2SNcndTAMGEJVOzXbPYNOrocB/adOVYxJ7HeVFIwK
BDRezxdrBA40pqGD0cbE/d61A664C6CVQvJPYS9VgDKAeO3G6aScuidkI0sCdcFS
qfJ3xji+4UftOfkIcmY6z2H+jhBckOu2kYeBMbN+S5eTjOc7xoWww5RmlIcVshPg
5e8kgm/M3X023p1gu2LRtQTok1JO3hEWb8mXbkj3zaP1UDDIhVe+MvvLjjnVFGks
ZMCtDbFSt/fItkXKFxFTqc7HlPiv5Lkr7l+5lwkvZExtL3IYYXeviDuNV+VB45AR
ln/whGc2b/CEgfon247LFpEEWS8a5uq8EW9GeWVcuIC07jloK/Bbn8J0xj72RUYP
VpRuqUrtgx7BVAk+6H8sw3QavCYVvYg49nogS6gTP/bvstVzMF9C3E+om1R0/2Yq
iH/QLUGj27m3uPaMptSvXoINt6rYFMBsBOZV8dtUymIg7vP/lCoBGy7f7VW/Uv11
4gebadhm2VnHEdq0qD73CZsI2KHBWmaHWEeVeJUIk+0QmX1F5P7HRw4pD1yd+bpa
okAgmLRI4qGnoCZmnMoA
=J1Ph
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--Apple-Mail=_DE3568EF-F524-45B3-92F1-C07102A1522F--



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?42A03EA9-7F8E-446E-B430-7431AB9CE2E6>