Date: Tue, 26 Jul 2005 22:20:33 +0200 From: =?ISO-8859-1?Q?K=F6vesd=E1n_G=E1bor?= <gabor.kovesdan@t-hosting.hu> To: Nikolas Britton <nikolas.britton@gmail.com> Cc: FreeBSD - Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: FreeBSD 6 Message-ID: <42E69B11.6070208@t-hosting.hu> In-Reply-To: <ef10de9a05072613007ac60130@mail.gmail.com> References: <ef10de9a05072613007ac60130@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Nikolas Britton wrote: >Do I always need to run 'make cleandepend' when rebuilding a kernel, >normally I build my kernels the old school way? > > > I suspect it is only needed, when You want to rebuild Your custom kernel, but haven't deleted the /usr/src/sys/arch/compile/KERNCONF/ directory, so there is some old junk. >Is it just me or is -O2 now the default for kernel builds? What about >-Os, safe to use? > > > So is it for me. But if I specify some CFLAGS, for example -O3 -march=athlon64, the building fails, but CFLAGS mustn't affect the kernel compiling process afaik. There is COPTFLAGS for that reason. I've also made a PR about this new, unwanted behaviour, but haven't got any answers so yet. >The kernel build failed when it tired to compile the r128drm device. > >Is it safe to run the ULE scheduler instead of the 4BSD scheduler, ULE >is commented out in the default kernel? > > > It's nice for me. I had a general protection fault, but I can't prove, that ULE made that, I had similar with 4BSD. FreeBSD 6 is quite stable for me when I don't use my nve network interface that has a poor driver. >Is the new ATA RAID stuff, metadata something, going to be backported >to 5.x? I'm trying setup a RAID 1 mirror with Intel ICH5R / Adaptec >HostRAID but it looks like it's not supported in 5.x > >---------- > >Feel free to add more questions to this thread. >_______________________________________________ > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?42E69B11.6070208>