Date: Tue, 26 Nov 2002 15:55:09 -0600 (CST) From: "Scott A. Moberly" <smoberly@karamazov.org> To: <user@mail.econolodgetulsa.com> Cc: <questions@FreeBSD.ORG> Subject: Re: port redirect with ipfw NOT NAT (not NAT) Message-ID: <43498.65.221.169.187.1038347709.squirrel@mail.karamazov.org> In-Reply-To: <20021126123656.G77087-100000@mail.econolodgetulsa.com> References: <20021126123656.G77087-100000@mail.econolodgetulsa.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
> > Hello, > > I want to perform a very simple act: > > All traffic going to 10.10.10.10 port 50 > should go to > 10.10.10.10 port 5050 > > That's it. The trick is, I am _not_ interested in running NAT. This is > not some cable modem or laptop splitting my DSL service - this is a > rackmount firewall on a real network. So again, I do not have any > interest in running NAT in any form. Not interested, thanks. > > But, I cannot seem to figure out what the ipfw rule is to perform this > simple task. So the question is: > > > What is the ipfw syntax to redirect all traffic from one port to > another. > > > Thanks! Have you tried something like: add 01000 fwd 10.10.10.10,5050 tcp from any to 10.10.10.10 50 --- Scott A. Moberly smoberly@karamazov.org To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?43498.65.221.169.187.1038347709.squirrel>