Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Wed, 12 Oct 2005 12:41:47 -0400
From:      Frank Laszlo <laszlof@tvog.net>
To:        Joshua Bell <josh@oplink.net>
Cc:        freebsd-advocacy@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Bind within src-contrib
Message-ID:  <434D3CCB.4020303@tvog.net>
In-Reply-To: <20051012113622.26a85118.josh@oplink.net>
References:  <20051012113622.26a85118.josh@oplink.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


Joshua Bell wrote:

>Hi,
>
>  I was attempting to build a minimal supfile, when I noticed that bind was included within contrib.  This to me seems like something that should be included within the ports tree, or atleast be included in a portion of the tree with less crucial software.
>
>  I personally do not see a reason for this, but please enlighten me on why this is done.
>
>-Josh
>
>  
>

How would you like a system with no host(1), dig(1), or nslookup(1)? I 
personally consider these tools essential for a freebsd system.

__________________________________________________
Frank Laszlo
System Administrator
The VonOstin Group
Email:  laszlof@tvog.net
WWW:    http://www.vonostingroup.com
Mobile: 248-863-7584






Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?434D3CCB.4020303>