Date: Thu, 29 Dec 2005 13:48:42 +0800 From: David Xu <davidxu@freebsd.org> To: Jason Evans <jasone@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: New malloc ready, take 42 Message-ID: <43B378BA.10201@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <811F628B-A89B-4359-A219-13B5337726A9@freebsd.org> References: <E1E22E2D-A6D5-49CC-9649-C37C50F0443B@freebsd.org> <43B36B83.7080404@freebsd.org> <32729773-B07C-4AEE-92D0-62ACE0E3AFEB@freebsd.org> <43B36EB9.70205@freebsd.org> <2E722A13-C880-41B6-A84C-3927C8FE90E5@freebsd.org> <43B3768F.40704@freebsd.org> <811F628B-A89B-4359-A219-13B5337726A9@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jason Evans wrote: > > On Dec 28, 2005, at 9:39 PM, David Xu wrote: > >> >> OK, I have linked /etc/malloc.conf to aj, this changes the performance: >> >> %super-smack ./select-key.smack 4 10000 >> Query Barrel Report for client smacker1 >> connect: max=23ms min=0ms avg= 5ms from 4 clients >> Query_type num_queries max_time min_time q_per_s >> select_index 80000 0 0 20480.54 >> select_index 80000 0 0 19734.14 >> select_index 80000 0 0 19846.49 >> select_index 80000 0 0 20045.10 >> select_index 80000 0 0 19544.33 >> >> but it still can not beat phkmalloc. :-) > > > What is the performance of phkmalloc under those testing conditions? > > Thanks, > Jason > > I remembered its highest number is 216xxx.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?43B378BA.10201>