Date: Wed, 18 Jan 2006 11:34:47 +0100 From: Roderick van Domburg <r.s.a.vandomburg@student.utwente.nl> To: Pav Lucistnik <pav@FreeBSD.org> Cc: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: ports/91828: New port: net/rubygem-net-ssh Non-interactive SSH processing Message-ID: <43CE19C7.9080202@student.utwente.nl> In-Reply-To: <200601180721.k0I7LRD9073699@freefall.freebsd.org> References: <200601180721.k0I7LRD9073699@freefall.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Hi Pav, > Synopsis: New port: net/rubygem-net-ssh Non-interactive SSH processing > > State-Changed-From-To: open->closed > State-Changed-By: pav > State-Changed-When: Wed Jan 18 07:20:58 UTC 2006 > State-Changed-Why: > New port added _into security category_ instead of net (all ssh ports are > in security). I also fixed ruby-password dependency. > > http://www.freebsd.org/cgi/query-pr.cgi?pr=91828 > OK. The reason I initially put it into net, is because p5-Net-SSH is there as well. rubygem-net-ssh and p5-Net-SSH are basically doing the same thing. Should either then be moved? - Roderick
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?43CE19C7.9080202>