Date: Thu, 02 Feb 2006 22:24:04 +0100 From: Pawel Worach <pawel.worach@gmail.com> To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org> Cc: Perforce Change Reviews <perforce@freebsd.org>, Robert Watson <rwatson@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: PERFORCE change 90830 for review Message-ID: <43E27874.9060409@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200602021340.03928.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <200601312102.k0VL24It078902@repoman.freebsd.org> <43E1C275.8070600@gmail.com> <200602021340.03928.jhb@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
John Baldwin wrote: > > Actually, I think && is right. The conditional code is meant to be exposed to > userland and not the kernel and _KERNEL is for FreeBSD and KERNEL for OS X. > Aha, in that case the #endif comment needs updating :) --- sys/bsm/audit.h.orig Thu Feb 2 21:40:33 2006 +++ sys/bsm/audit.h Thu Feb 2 21:40:44 2006 @@ -338,7 +338,7 @@ int setaudit(const struct auditinfo *); int getaudit_addr(struct auditinfo_addr *, int); int setaudit_addr(const struct auditinfo_addr *, int); -#endif /* defined(_KERNEL) || defined(KERNEL) */ +#endif /* defined(_KERNEL) && defined(KERNEL) */ __END_DECLS -- Pawel
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?43E27874.9060409>