Date: Tue, 09 May 2006 14:03:41 -0700 From: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> To: Milan Obuch <net@dino.sk> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org, Ray Mihm <ray.mihm@gmail.com> Subject: Re: vrf support in FreeBSD Message-ID: <446103AD.5020006@elischer.org> In-Reply-To: <200605092239.46594.net@dino.sk> References: <5EB31780BD297F46812C8F495FA08F620438CAE3@electron.jnpr.net> <4460D595.8000408@elischer.org> <1aa142960605091325j151df1f6j909ee9ca3ae0ed75@mail.gmail.com> <200605092239.46594.net@dino.sk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Milan Obuch wrote: >On Tuesday 09 May 2006 22:25, Ray Mihm wrote: > > >>Can't you just incorporate Marko's work at >>http://www.tel.fer.hr/zec/BSD/vimage/index.html? The design looks >>pretty clean too. And, XORP which probably is multiple tables aware, >>would make FreeBSD a really kick-ass routing platform. >> >> marco and I have discussed this. it is a very heavyweight solution.. using ipfw tables as ancilary routing tables is a very light weight solution.. >> >> > >Unfortunately, this is not easily doable. There is major architecture change >after 4.x and Marko's work is 4.x based. But base design is really clean and >should be mimicked as close as possible, imho. > >I know this is not easy task. Just shame on me I can't help here with some >code :( > >Regards, >Milan > >Please reply to maling list only. I read it regularly. > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?446103AD.5020006>