Date: Tue, 15 Aug 2006 14:44:52 +0200 From: Attila Nagy <bra@fsn.hu> To: Brian Candler <B.Candler@pobox.com> Cc: freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: Redundant/failover NFS servers - stale NFS file handle Message-ID: <44E1C1C4.5030407@fsn.hu> In-Reply-To: <20060815122533.GB89848@uk.tiscali.com> References: <200608141555.k7EFthXw092647@lurza.secnetix.de> <44E0C450.8050602@fsn.hu> <20060815122533.GB89848@uk.tiscali.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 08/15/06 14:25, Brian Candler wrote: > On Mon, Aug 14, 2006 at 08:43:28PM +0200, Attila Nagy wrote: >>> We use NetApp Filer clusters (NAS) for that purpose. >>> They aren't cheap, but they work very well. >> I don't like blackboxes with nice GUIs. :) > They have a command-line interface too :) Seriously, these are really > excellent devices. I know, but I would like to solve this problem without buying (or using our existing) NAS boxes. >> I can solve this problem with Linux > How? With a shared filesystem of course. BTW, I'm much more interested in the Solaris NFS failover mode now. Any chance that the NFS guys can take a look at it? It's a pretty old feature and can be very useful in any scenarios, where RO NFS mounts are enough. Thanks, -- Attila Nagy e-mail: Attila.Nagy@fsn.hu Free Software Network (FSN.HU) phone: +3630 306 6758 http://www.fsn.hu/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44E1C1C4.5030407>