Date: Wed, 29 Aug 2012 14:32:01 -0400 From: Lowell Gilbert <freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org> To: Jack Stone <jacks@sage-american.com> Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Upgrading perl Message-ID: <44vcg11rdq.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> In-Reply-To: <503E3071.7000905@sage-american.com> (Jack Stone's message of "Wed, 29 Aug 2012 10:08:33 -0500") References: <503BF131.4030803@sage-american.com> <44ehmp3k1a.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> <503E3071.7000905@sage-american.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Jack Stone <jacks@sage-american.com> writes: > Actually, on other servers with the same upgrading needs, perl-5.12 > installed without any issue. My intention is to upgrade perl in > increments to get well past EOL. You're somewhat on your own, then; I can't test any of my ideas before suggesting them to you. > Wonder if I just deinstalled the old perl5-5.10 and then installed the > perl5-12 would work. I can do that right from the port: make perl5-12 > first to see if that works, then: > # make deinstall (perl-5.10) then: make install clean I would be surprised if the perl-5.12 port will build for you; I think you'll get the same error. If not, then yes, it should work. > What do you think? I've got to move up because an important perl > program requires a minimum 5.12. Well, it's also possible that there's a local problem on that machine. You indicated that you used portupgrade for similar updates on similarly-aged machines, but I'll guess that they were only roughly similar. I'll guess that you built your own INDEX file; if not, you probably should (and the associated database for portupgrade). Compare the infrastructure in ports/Mk (and maybe /usr/share/mk) with the similar machines that succeeded, and look at the Makefile in perl5.12 to make sure it sets options properly. Good luck.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?44vcg11rdq.fsf>