Date: Wed, 27 Sep 2006 14:19:12 +0100 From: "Bruce M. Simpson" <bms@FreeBSD.org> To: Marko Lerota <marko.lerota@zg.t-com.hr> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: problem with routnig Message-ID: <451A7A50.7090803@FreeBSD.org> In-Reply-To: <86d59h4syy.fsf@sparrow.local> References: <86d59h4syy.fsf@sparrow.local>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Marko Lerota wrote: > route_lan2="-net 192.168.2.0 -netmask 255.255.255.0 -iface xl0" > route_lan2="-net 192.168.2.0 -netmask 255.255.255.0 192.168.1.1" > Neither of these subnet routes should be necessary as 192.168.2.0/24 is already directly connected via fxp0. Do you still see the problem without this route installed? The netstat output you posted contains the directly-connected subnet route 192.168.2.0/24 which is automatically added when you configure the interface address. Regards, BMS
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?451A7A50.7090803>