Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 7 Dec 2020 00:21:32 -0800
From:      Mark Millard <marklmi@yahoo.com>
To:        mmel@freebsd.org
Cc:        freebsd-arm <freebsd-arm@freebsd.org>
Subject:   Re: ThunderX Panic after r368370
Message-ID:  <4528E502-D007-48E5-B6A5-8E4376A2B05E@yahoo.com>
In-Reply-To: <BB5C4C3E-EDF6-4C3D-BEE1-F8B2989216E0@yahoo.com>
References:  <1C3442ED-278E-45B8-9206-0DD24FCBC237@brickporch.com> <4331eee0-74a6-565c-3bec-0051415b2bc1@freebsd.org> <56F0E9EB-0B78-4B0B-830A-48F8AFC5ABE1@yahoo.com> <91654fc4-8734-d8a7-5309-0400f418438a@freebsd.org> <BB5C4C3E-EDF6-4C3D-BEE1-F8B2989216E0@yahoo.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


On 2020-Dec-6, at 13:30, Mark Millard <marklmi at yahoo.com> wrote:

> On 2020-Dec-6, at 03:51, Michal Meloun <meloun.michal at gmail.com> =
wrote:
>=20
> On 06.12.2020 10:47, Mark Millard wrote:
>>> On 2020-Dec-6, at 00:17, Michal Meloun <meloun.michal at gmail.com> =
wrote:
>>>> On 06.12.2020 3:21, Marcel Flores wrote:
>>>>> Hi All,
>>>>> Looks like the ThunderX started panicking at boot after r368370:
>>>>> https://reviews.freebsd.org/rS368370
>>>>> =46rom a verbose boot, it looks like it bails in gic0 =
redistributor setup(?):
>>>>> gic0: CPU29 Re-Distributor woke up
>>>>> gic0: CPU24 enabled CPU interface via system registers
>>>>> gic0: CPU17 enabled CPU interface via system registers
>>>>> gic0: CPU29 enabled CPU interface via system registers
>>>>> done
>>>>> Full Verbose boot:
>>>>> https://gist.github.com/mesflores/f026122495c8494d041bce04d30b15bb
>>>>> I'm not really familiar with the details of the commit, but happy =
to test
>>>>> anything if anyone has any ideas.
>>>>=20
>>>>=20
>>>> Hi Marcel
>>>> are you able to get crashdump and do backtrace?
>>>> =
https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/developers-handbook/kerneldebug.html#=
kerneldebug-obtain
>>>> and
>>>> =
https://www.freebsd.org/doc/en/books/developers-handbook/kerneldebug-gdb.h=
tml
>>>> If not, I'll make some debug patch.
>>>>=20
>>>> It's weird, even though GIC is potentially affected by my patch, in =
this case the cpuid numbering was not changed.
>>> (I've no access to a ThunderX. I just looked for my own curiosity.
>>> Sorry if this is obvious and so is noise.)
>>> When I looked at the code it appeared to be the last "->" in
>>> the following that was dereferencing the nullptr value (via [x8]
>>> in assembler notation):
>>> static uint64_t
>>> its_cmd_prepare(struct its_cmd *cmd, struct its_cmd_desc *desc)
>>> {
>>>        uint64_t target;
>>>        uint8_t cmd_type;
>>>        u_int size;
>>>        cmd_type =3D desc->cmd_type;
>>>        target =3D ITS_TARGET_NONE;
>>>        switch (cmd_type) {
>>>        case ITS_CMD_MOVI:      /* Move interrupt ID to another =
collection */
>>>                target =3D desc->cmd_desc_movi.col->col_target;
>>> . . .
>>> In other words: it appeared to me that the above =
desc->cmd_desc_movi.col
>>> evaluated as 0 when used in what was reported.
>> This is very probably right analysis. But problem is that =
cmd_desc_movi.col should not be NULL, is initialized in its_cmd_movi =
from sc->sc_its_cols which should be allocated in gicv3_its_attach().
>>=20
>=20
> The following is unlikely to directly contribute to the
> specific problem's solution but documents an oddity that
> took my time while looking around related the problem.
>=20
. . .

I'm omitting the material about the "start" part of the comment
below. I've more directly useful for the problem later below.

> /*
> * Note that `start` and the returned value from BIT_FFS_AT are
> * 1-based bit indices.
> */
> #define BIT_FFS_AT(_s, p, start) __extension__ ({                      =
 \
> . . .
>=20
. . .=20

Looks to me like fdt_cpuid's use in cpu_init_fdt is one of the issues
with what is added to each cpuset_domain[domain] :

	/* Skip boot CPU */
	if (__pcpu[0].pc_mpidr =3D=3D (target_cpu & CPU_AFF_MASK))
		return (TRUE);
. . .
	fdt_cpuid++;

	/* Try to read the numa node of this cpu */
	if (vm_ndomains =3D=3D 1 ||
	    OF_getencprop(node, "numa-node-id", &domain, sizeof(domain)) =
<=3D 0)
		domain =3D 0;
	__pcpu[fdt_cpuid].pc_domain =3D domain;
	if (domain < MAXMEMDOM)
		CPU_SET(fdt_cpuid, &cpuset_domain[domain]);

fdt_cpuid's initial value can not be added by this code: it is
incremented first.

cpu_mp_start initializes fdt_cpuid via:

                fdt_cpuid =3D 1;
		ofw_cpu_early_foreach(cpu_init_fdt, true);

So fdt_cpuid=3D=3D2 is the smallest value that can be added to
&cpuset_domain[domain] via that ofw_cpu_early_foreach call
that in turn calls cpu_init_fdt.

More then that, there is also the "Skip boot CPU" code that
avoids ever adding the boot CPU to a &cpuset_domain[domain] .=20

This matches up well with the logs showing the two "NULL"
lines in:

gicv3_its_attach: per domain cpus
gicv3_its_attach: NULL its col[0]
gicv3_its_attach: NULL its col[1]
gicv3_its_attach: new its col[2]
gicv3_its_attach: new its col[3]
. . .
gicv3_its_attach: new its col[29]
gicv3_its_attach: new its col[30]
gicv3_its_attach: new its col[31]

and the log's content just before the panic:

gicv3_its_bind_intr: Enter
gicv3_its_select_cpu: cpuset not empty
its_cmd_movi: isrc_cpu 0, col; 0
panic: data abort with spinlock held



=3D=3D=3D
Mark Millard
marklmi at yahoo.com
( dsl-only.net went
away in early 2018-Mar)




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4528E502-D007-48E5-B6A5-8E4376A2B05E>