Date: Thu, 03 May 2007 19:12:45 +0200 From: "[LoN]Kamikaze" <LoN_Kamikaze@gmx.de> To: mal content <artifact.one@googlemail.com> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> Subject: Re: HEADS UP: xorg upgrade plans Message-ID: <463A180D.9030303@gmx.de> In-Reply-To: <8e96a0b90705030943w1ed479bei106e0ca1fe5a3eb1@mail.gmail.com> References: <20070502193159.GB42482@xor.obsecurity.org> <20070503023618.GA48256@xor.obsecurity.org> <8e96a0b90705030943w1ed479bei106e0ca1fe5a3eb1@mail.gmail.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
mal content wrote: >> /usr/local > > Hello. > > Why is FreeBSD using /usr/local instead of /usr/X11R7? > > thanks, > MC A version dependant directory structure hasn't been a good idea in the first place. No one was really able to tell weather to put a port into /usr/X11R6 or /usr/local anyway.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?463A180D.9030303>