Date: Wed, 16 May 2007 00:09:10 +0400 From: Roman Kurakin <rik@inse.ru> To: Eric Anderson <anderson@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: HEDSUP: man -k cleanup (man -k RAID, some bits are missing) Message-ID: <464A1366.3050809@inse.ru> In-Reply-To: <464A03E3.4040805@freebsd.org> References: <4649E0AD.4060705@inse.ru> <464A03E3.4040805@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Eric Anderson wrote: > On 05/15/07 11:32, Roman Kurakin wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Trying to obtain information about supported RAID devices in >> the system via `man -k RAID` I've found that not all known >> by me devices are there. So a grep-ed a bit and going to commit >> the following patchset. I think that keyword RAID should present >> in description of all these man pages. But may be I am wrong? >> >> There is also some bits I was not able to fix. >> 1) Is it safe to s/Array/RAID/ in ida(4)? > > I don't think that's good - an array isn't necessarily a RAID, and a > s/r of that name yields bad results. I am about brief description (.Nd) only. If driver supports some RAID arrays it should be marked as such. So may be "Array" => "Array (including RAID)" in .Nd? >> 2) Is it safe to mark ciss as driver for RAID controllers? >> 3) Should be isp(4) marked as driver for RAID controllers? > But isp isn't a RAID controller, it's an HBA. Thanks for information. It was just counted by grep results ;-) rik >> 4) Should geom(4) be patched as suggested in my patch or >> it is enough of mentioning in corresponding class utilities? >> 5) Have I missed smth else? >> >> PS. I think that there is other such places where `man -k` is not >> complete, so its good todo idea, currently not for me ;-). >> PPS. Sorry for crossposting. I hope I included all affected parties. > > > Eric >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?464A1366.3050809>