Date: Thu, 19 Jul 2007 19:16:48 -0700 From: Garrett Cooper <youshi10@u.washington.edu> To: Doug Barton <dougb@FreeBSD.org> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Robert Noland <rnoland@2hip.net>, Stephen Montgomery-Smith <stephen@math.missouri.edu> Subject: Re: Problems with +CONTENTS being messed up by pkg_delete -f Message-ID: <46A01B10.6080207@u.washington.edu> In-Reply-To: <469FB6D3.80607@FreeBSD.org> References: <20070718154452.B3091@math.missouri.edu> <1184799050.33981.66.camel@rnoland-ibm.acs.internap.com> <469EC915.7010006@math.missouri.edu> <469EE627.4000100@u.washington.edu> <1184866302.33981.89.camel@rnoland-ibm.acs.internap.com> <469FB6D3.80607@FreeBSD.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Doug Barton wrote:
> Robert Noland wrote:
>
>
>> Ok, so the issue that I hope to address is not really a "portmanager"
>> issue. The original version of package-depends
>>
>
> Just to be clear, you're talking about the target in bsd.port.mk, right?
>
> I've snipped the rest of your post since I get a feeling that what
> you're trying to get at might be important, but I cannot parse it even
> after rereading several times. Can you provide a concrete example,
> with names of actual ports so that we can look into this further?
>
> Doug
>
Personally I think that:
1. Versions shouldn't matter when calculating absolute dependencies
(i.e. net/samba may depend on popt).
2. If versions do change for a dependent package, the packages
dependent on the changed package should also be rebuilt.
-Garrett
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?46A01B10.6080207>