Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 24 Jan 2008 15:58:06 +0100
From:      Attila Nagy <bra@fsn.hu>
To:        freebsd-fs@freebsd.org
Cc:        Ruslan Ermilov <ru@FreeBSD.org>
Subject:   Re: cvs commit: src/share/man/man4 sched_4bsd.4 sched_ule.4
Message-ID:  <4798A77E.1030308@fsn.hu>
In-Reply-To: <200801241348.m0ODmKZu057100@repoman.freebsd.org>
References:  <200801241348.m0ODmKZu057100@repoman.freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 01/24/08 14:48, Ruslan Ermilov wrote:
> ru          2008-01-24 13:48:20 UTC
>
>   FreeBSD src repository
>
>   Modified files:
>     share/man/man4       sched_4bsd.4 sched_ule.4 
>   Log:
>   - sched_4bsd is no longer a default system scheduler on some
>     architectures, so call it "traditional" instead.
>   
>   - sched_ule is no longer buggy or experimental (according to
>     rev. 1.7 of sched_ule(4)), so don't call it experimental
>     (reported by a user on stable@).
>   
I've tried ULE+ZFS on two machines recently (on 7-STABLE). One desktop 
and one server. Both of them froze (for example on the server an already 
running top kept running, but if I exited from that, I couldn't do 
anything anymore. On the desktop, the window manager stops (no mouse, no 
keyboard), but the clock applet remained active).
I thought it's ZFS, because all of these popped out while there were 
increased disk activity, but on monday I've switched both of them to 
SCHED_4BSD and since that no freeze happened.

Anyone out there with ULE+ZFS (I ran them on i386 with 1 GB of RAM, SMP 
systems)?

(BTW, ULE was a little bit sluggish while playing music and overall)

-- 
Attila Nagy                                   e-mail: Attila.Nagy@fsn.hu
Free Software Network (FSN.HU)                 phone: +3630 306 6758
http://www.fsn.hu/




Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4798A77E.1030308>