Date: Fri, 01 Feb 2008 18:00:52 -0500 From: "Aryeh M. Friedman" <aryeh.friedman@gmail.com> To: Ollivier Robert <roberto@keltia.freenix.fr> Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [OT] Q: what would you choose for a VCS today Message-ID: <47A3A4A4.1050504@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <20080201225622.GA20139@keltia.freenix.fr> References: <78cb3d3f0801302245v2183c613t6ecdd9acebbe9ef7@mail.gmail.com> <20080131110237.06860561@mbook.mired.org> <78cb3d3f0802011434p5bed2b1ex39320962f0bc8bf5@mail.gmail.com> <20080201174850.54fb9dab@bhuda.mired.org> <20080201225622.GA20139@keltia.freenix.fr>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 Ollivier Robert wrote: > According to Mike Meyer: >> If the only thing preventing that was their OSS license terms, I'd be >> surprised if they wouldn't at least consider relaxing them for >> FreeBSD. > > Perforce has already been thought as a replacement (back in 2000 when p4 > was introduced) but it will not be able to deal with ports and even on > projects right now, we have issues with too many client views/changesets. Ports 2.0 is using aegis (aegis.sf.net)... any possibility for wider use? Note: I am in the middle of making it FreeBSD friendly and beefing up the automated portions of distributed repos - -- Aryeh M. Friedman FloSoft Systems, Java Tool Developers Developer, not business, friendly http://www.flosoft-systems.com "Free software != Free beer" Blog: http://www.flosoft-systems.com/flosoft_systems_community/blogs/aryeh/index.php -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.4 (FreeBSD) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFHo6SkQi2hk2LEXBARAqFtAJ9fJ6zTzIdX10ZssmxZ3UApdD9XdgCeOA0F UKmqt5DZY0AFVA0ST/3QcU8= =CcGt -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?47A3A4A4.1050504>