Date: Sat, 29 Nov 2008 17:34:28 +0100 From: Peter Boosten <peter@boosten.org> To: Dan <dan-freebsd-questions@ourbrains.org> Cc: "freebsd-questions@freebsd.org" <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: Unix program that sends email directly using MX record Message-ID: <47D7B64C-E783-48C8-A33B-A48AB66DA2E5@boosten.org> In-Reply-To: <20081129160329.GA27853@ourbrains.org> References: <26face530811221316y5be5bf40ra5c38f389f554ca1@mail.gmail.com> <20081124173650.GA933@ourbrains.org> <20081124193819.GF55491@gizmo.acns.msu.edu> <20081129160329.GA27853@ourbrains.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 29 nov 2008, at 17:03, Dan <dan-freebsd-questions@ourbrains.org> wrote: > >>> >> > > It's not prejudicial. I do not wish to start yet another MTA flamewar, > but you can't deny Sendmail's poor security, design, performance, and > complex configuration. The poor security history is there, the poor > funnel design and conf files that require a scripting language are > obviously ugly. Yeah, in 1845 it was. Sendmail is as secure as any other mta. And using m4, configuring is poc. Peter -- HTTP://www.boosten.org
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?47D7B64C-E783-48C8-A33B-A48AB66DA2E5>