Date: Tue, 18 Mar 2008 11:48:15 +0300 From: "Andrey V. Elsukov" <bu7cher@yandex.ru> To: Julian Elischer <julian@elischer.org> Cc: Vadim Goncharov <vadim_nuclight@mail.ru>, freebsd-ipfw@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: kern/80642: [ipfw] [patch] ipfw small patch - new RULE OPTION Message-ID: <47DF81CF.9040906@yandex.ru> In-Reply-To: <47DF78AF.400@elischer.org> References: <200803122100.m2CL0t7V088955@freefall.freebsd.org> <slrnfthsg7.dgk.vadim_nuclight@hostel.avtf.net> <20080313094356.GA9219@tin.it> <47DF72A3.4030502@yandex.ru> <47DF78AF.400@elischer.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Julian Elischer wrote: >> About Vadim's prepositions: >> 1. tablearg: it's possible, but now we use u32 argument in >> tables, but counterlimits are 64-bits values. First of we >> should extend our current table argument to 64 bit. > > tables should be expanded to have different types of values.. > 32 but ints > IP addresses (currently I'm overlaying it on 32 bit ints) > IPV6 addresses. > skipto locations > byte limits.. Yes, i agree. As I remember, we already talked about this some time ago. -- WBR, Andrey V. Elsukov
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?47DF81CF.9040906>