Date: Sat, 22 Sep 2007 16:46:39 +0000 From: "Ben Kaduk" <minimarmot@gmail.com> To: "Bruce A. Mah" <bmah@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Subject: Re: sgml entities for CPU architectures? Message-ID: <47d0403c0709220946q323af62ah1c4565b31f2677a@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <46F541FD.8040807@freebsd.org> References: <47d0403c0709211213n50988b33u2b9bdd15475bfcdd@mail.gmail.com> <1217454532.20070922005116@rulez.sk> <46F541FD.8040807@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 9/22/07, Bruce A. Mah <bmah@freebsd.org> wrote: > If memory serves me right, Daniel Gerzo wrote: > > >> I'm updating my patch to the FAQ (docs/115000) for danger@'s > >> (somewhat) new daily snapshot > >> builds, which are specific to x86 and amd64. Should I just use literals for > >> these architectures, or are the entity-ified somewhere that I haven't found yet? > > > > As far as I know, we do not have entities for architectures. > > The release documents grew these entities fairly recently...see > src/release/doc/share/sgml/release.ent (on HEAD only at the moment). But is release.ent pulled into the build of books/faq/book.sgml ? -Ben Kaduk > > Bruce. > > > >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?47d0403c0709220946q323af62ah1c4565b31f2677a>