Date: Wed, 29 Mar 2006 13:49:59 -0800 (PST) From: "Freddie Cash" <fcash@ocis.net> To: "Danny Pansters" <danny@ricin.com> Cc: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Re: mutually exclusive OPTIONS? Message-ID: <48051.192.168.0.10.1143668999.squirrel@webmail.sd73.bc.ca> In-Reply-To: <200603292344.52149.danny@ricin.com> References: <200603292344.52149.danny@ricin.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, March 29, 2006 1:44 pm, Danny Pansters wrote: > I'm making a port that has several mutually exclusive compile-time > options. I want to present them as OPTIONS as should, but is there a > way within the ports framework to ensure that only one (of the 5 > possibilities) is selected, or when one of them is the default but > then with 4 mutually exclusive OPTIONS if the user needs one of teh > non-default options? Hopefully someone else will know a better way, but the way I've used and seen in other ports is: .if defined(WITH_OPTION1) && defined(WITH_OPTION2) IGNORE= error! You can't select these two options together. .endif And so on for all the combinations that should not be selected. :) ---- Freddie Cash fcash@ocis.net
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?48051.192.168.0.10.1143668999.squirrel>