Date: Tue, 22 Apr 2008 21:52:27 +0200 From: mato <gamato@users.sf.net> To: Ian Smith <smithi@nimnet.asn.au> Cc: freebsd-mobile@freebsd.org Subject: Re: battery monitor with KDE 64 bit Message-ID: <480E41FB.2080503@users.sf.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.3.96.1080416144944.14728A-100000@gaia.nimnet.asn.au> References: <Pine.BSF.3.96.1080416144944.14728A-100000@gaia.nimnet.asn.au>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Ian Smith wrote: > FWIW, I've also long used sysutils/ascpu as a 60sec visual load monitor, > matching asapm's 'look', res. size and low cpu usage. At ~7days uptime: > > 3680 smithi 8 0 2344K 448K nanslp 44:06 0.00% 0.00% asapm > 3681 smithi 8 0 2564K 448K nanslp 41:53 0.00% 0.00% ascpu > 3514 root 96 0 1280K 264K select 36:32 0.00% 0.00% moused > > There's something wrong with asapm or with my system -- I configured asapm for 5 seconds updating (as opposed to default 1s) and after 3 hours of uptime it already consumed 30 CPU-seconds. (!) Regarding look, I would prefer asapm to use a bit more of space like wmbsdbatt does (or wmcpuload which I've long been using as a visual load monitor). Regards, Martin
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?480E41FB.2080503>