Date: Fri, 09 May 2008 14:55:06 -0400 From: DAve <dave.list@pixelhammer.com> To: User Questions <freebsd-questions@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: FBSD 6.2 Xeon 2.4ghz CPU and high load Message-ID: <48249E0A.8080709@pixelhammer.com> In-Reply-To: <9F98C32F-0DA0-40F9-B82B-4866F3D600CB@mac.com> References: <482473B7.7070707@pixelhammer.com> <48248AC9.5060507@infracaninophile.co.uk> <20080509202941.J53368@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> <9F98C32F-0DA0-40F9-B82B-4866F3D600CB@mac.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Chuck Swiger wrote: > On May 9, 2008, at 11:30 AM, Wojciech Puchar wrote: >>> Try 7.0 instead -- it has all of the speed at multi-threaded, multi-core >>> type stuff but has also regained the sort of performance levels you >>> could >> >> so 4.11 is fastest? > > For single-processor systems, FreeBSD 4.11 does very well at a lot of > tasks. However, Dave apparently has a 4-CPU system (~8 threads if he > enabled hyperthreading), and for real SMP hardware, more recent versions > of FreeBSD generally perform better than 4.x would. Single CPU quad core. ps -aux output is up, look under the FBSD dir. I also put up both dmesg.boot files from the servers. http://pixelhammer.com/Dan/ I do appreciate the assistance. DAve -- In 50 years, our descendants will look back on the early years of the internet, and much like we now look back on men with rockets on their back and feathers glued to their arms, marvel that we had the intelligence to wipe the drool from our chins.
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?48249E0A.8080709>