Date: Mon, 23 Jun 2008 11:14:09 -0500 From: Tim Nelson <tnelson@fudnet.net> To: Kage <jirokagey@hotmail.com> Cc: freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org Subject: Re: gem0 frame error Message-ID: <485FCBD1.8020807@fudnet.net> In-Reply-To: <18072527.post@talk.nabble.com> References: <18034453.post@talk.nabble.com> <20080622122635.GA9784@alchemy.franken.de> <18072527.post@talk.nabble.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Kage wrote: > > Marius Strobl wrote: > >> With what version of FreeBSD is this? >> >> Marius >> >> _______________________________________________ >> freebsd-sparc64@freebsd.org mailing list >> http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-sparc64 >> To unsubscribe, send any mail to "freebsd-sparc64-unsubscribe@freebsd.org" >> >> >> > > > I feel like punching myself. One of the first things you always learn about > systems is to "check the cables". Well, I thought back to the path this > system was connected through and then about the statement that 10BT > half-duplex is uncommon, which struck me again when it was mentioned. So I > checked, and it hit me so hard I slapped my forehead - the test systems I > have here run through an old superstack II....which is limited to 10BT. > Removing this from that switch and then wiring it directly into the good > switch fixed the problem completely. > > At least I can say I fixed something today. Thanks for the help! > > (It is 7.0-release, by the way) > Regardless... shouldn't the driver properly deal with being plugged into a 10BT Half-Duplex environment?
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?485FCBD1.8020807>