Date: Tue, 22 Jul 2008 18:40:15 -0500 From: "M. L. Dodson" <mldodson@comcast.net> To: ports@freebsd.org Subject: Help for a problematic port to replace biology/nab Message-ID: <48866FDF.9030903@comcast.net>
next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
I am the maintainer of biology/nab and asked that it be marked deprecated several months ago. I just filed a PR to have it removed. Nab has been superseded by AmberTools (also by the nab developers). I have the current version of AmberTools building with no problems from within a skeleton port. The problem (and I do not see any solution) is that AmberTools assumes that it will be built in its final installed location. This location is hardwired throughout the compiled code. The build process fails spectacularly if you specify some other location, then move the built code and data. Is there some secret method to handle such ports for which I do not possess the magical decoder ring? Any help would be appreciated. Bud Dodson -- M. L. Dodson Email: mldodson-at-comcast-net Phone: eight_three_two-five_63-386_one
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?48866FDF.9030903>