Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Mon, 22 Sep 2008 21:14:43 +0200
From:      Miroslav Lachman <000.fbsd@quip.cz>
To:        "Bjoern A. Zeeb" <bzeeb-lists@lists.zabbadoz.net>
Cc:        freebsd-jail@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: request for (security) comments on this setup
Message-ID:  <48D7EEA3.4040504@quip.cz>
In-Reply-To: <20080922155111.T65801@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net>
References:  <Pine.BSF.4.64.0809220809440.16549@tdream.lly.earlham.edu> <20080922155111.T65801@maildrop.int.zabbadoz.net>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Bjoern A. Zeeb wrote:
> On Mon, 22 Sep 2008, Randy Schultz wrote:
> 
> Hi,
> 
>> I'm mounting some iSCSI storage in a jail.  It's mounting in the jail via
>> fstab.<jailname>.  When the jail is up and I'm logged into the jail I 
>> can cd
>> to the mount point, r/w etc., everything seems to work.  What's weird 
>> tho' is,
>> while a df on the parent shows the partion mounted as expected, a df 
>> inside
>> the jail shows the local disk but not the iSCSI mount.
>> ...
>> So, my first question is what am I missing, the second is does 
>> mounting things
>> this way into a jail pose any sort of risk for escaping the jail?
> 
> 
> Does anything change if you do a
>     sysctl security.jail.enforce_statfs=1
> 
> If that's what you want you can add the following lines to
> /etc/sysctl.conf in the base system so it is automatically set upon
> boot:
> 
> # jails
> security.jail.enforce_statfs=1

Have this any impact on security?

# sysctl -d security.jail.enforce_statfs
security.jail.enforce_statfs: Processes in jail cannot see all mounted 
file systems

For what this sysctl is implemented?

Thanks

Miroslav Lachman



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?48D7EEA3.4040504>