Date: Mon, 3 Sep 2007 20:54:57 -0300 From: Nenhum_de_Nos <matheusber@gmail.com> To: "Bruce Cran" <bruce@cran.org.uk>, freebsd-current@freebsd.org Subject: Re: qemu on a recent -current, slow like a 486 ! Message-ID: <4956a5e50709031654v9b13eb9na0a964dd9cb7f497@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <46DC4118.8020300@cran.org.uk> References: <4956a5e50709022056o16fe85c8oab72532afe335b43@mail.gmail.com> <059F5A32-4979-422B-B42B-8163A151E874@dougk-ff7.net> <46DB9A1E.4080000@cran.org.uk> <4956a5e50709030343x6de3ab6frab925421859bd7f0@mail.gmail.com> <46DC4118.8020300@cran.org.uk>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 9/3/07, Bruce Cran <bruce@cran.org.uk> wrote: > Nenhum_de_Nos wrote: > > I have disabled all but one debug support: > > > > makeoptions DEBUG=-g # Build kernel with gdb(1) debug symbols > > > > no witness also > > > > thanks > > > > matheus > > > > > > Hi Matheus, > > If you haven't tried kqemu-kmod, I would highly recommend it - with the > caveat that, being a kernel module that hasn't been extensively tested, > it may crash your system. > It should speed up qemu to near-native speeds since it allows the code > to run natively instead of being interpreted one instruction at a time. > > Cheers, > Bruce Cran hm, I'll try this today :) thanks, but now what I think will most kill performance is that even though I say -smp 2 and it has two cpus (my machine is in fact dual core), it has one and only one process for all qemu vm, and there fore uses just one core. is it really supposed to behave this way ? thanks again matheus -- We will call you cygnus, The God of balance you shall be
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4956a5e50709031654v9b13eb9na0a964dd9cb7f497>