Date: Wed, 21 Jan 2009 16:20:52 +0200 From: Andriy Gapon <avg@icyb.net.ua> To: John Baldwin <jhb@freebsd.org>, "M. Warner Losh" <imp@bsdimp.com> Cc: Archie Cobbs <archie@freebsd.org>, freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: smb(4): address format Message-ID: <49772F44.1030806@icyb.net.ua> In-Reply-To: <200901210857.22204.jhb@freebsd.org> References: <496C8C6A.2030708@icyb.net.ua> <20090115.110824.298933043.imp@bsdimp.com> <497088E6.4020908@icyb.net.ua> <200901210857.22204.jhb@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
on 21/01/2009 15:57 John Baldwin said the following: > On Friday 16 January 2009 8:17:26 am Andriy Gapon wrote: >> on 15/01/2009 20:08 M. Warner Losh said the following: >>> The format that is preferred on FreeBSD is xxxxxxxx0b. That's the >>> format that the existing IIC bridge drivers use and deal with. I've >>> not looked at the SMB drivers, but I went through all the iic bridge >>> drivers in the 6.x time frame and made sure they were all consistent. >>> If I missed the smb drivers, that's my bad. >>> >>> I could find no evidence that there was a format that was more >>> preferred apart from the dozen data sheets that I'd read at the time >>> which used the xxxxxxx0b. >> What about the attached patch. >> It brings ichsmb in line with this format and also adds a simple check >> into smb(4). > > Commit! > I guess this would also need a note in UPDATING and some HEADS UP in current@. -- Andriy Gapon
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?49772F44.1030806>