Date: Thu, 03 Dec 2009 11:00:23 -0600 From: Nathan Whitehorn <nwhitehorn@freebsd.org> To: Rafal Jaworowski <raj@FreeBSD.org> Cc: Perforce Change Reviews <perforce@freebsd.org> Subject: Re: PERFORCE change 171338 for review Message-ID: <4B17EEA7.5040502@freebsd.org> In-Reply-To: <200912031658.nB3Gw60w063997@repoman.freebsd.org> References: <200912031658.nB3Gw60w063997@repoman.freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Since this is the same as the OFW interface, or is supposed to be, would it make sense to make this be MI in /sys/dev/ofw, attaching with a low priority to any device with a phandle and OF children? -Nathan Rafal Jaworowski wrote: > http://p4web.freebsd.org/chv.cgi?CH=171338 > > Change 171338 by raj@raj_fdt on 2009/12/03 16:57:28 > > Initial version of the fdtbus driver. > > It handles IRQ and MEM resources. Based on the device tree top-level > entities are instantiated as newbus children on the fdtbus. > > The mpc85xx directory is temporary, it will be something generic once > we are done with FDT bringup for PowerPC and move on to ARM. > > Affected files ... > > .. //depot/projects/fdt/sys/conf/files.powerpc#4 edit > .. //depot/projects/fdt/sys/powerpc/mpc85xx/fdtbus.c#1 add > > Differences ... > > ==== //depot/projects/fdt/sys/conf/files.powerpc#4 (text+ko) ==== > > @@ -119,6 +119,7 @@ > powerpc/mpc85xx/atpic.c optional mpc85xx isa > powerpc/mpc85xx/ds1553_bus_lbc.c optional ds1553 > powerpc/mpc85xx/ds1553_core.c optional ds1553 > +powerpc/mpc85xx/fdtbus.c optional fdt > powerpc/mpc85xx/i2c.c optional iicbus mpc85xx > powerpc/mpc85xx/isa.c optional mpc85xx isa > powerpc/mpc85xx/lbc.c optional mpc85xx >
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?4B17EEA7.5040502>